Padlock Clips vs. OTSC: Advanced Defect Closure Comparisons

Key Takeaways

  • Clinical Bottom Line
  • Macroscopic Clip Systems for Defect Closure

Clinical Bottom Line

Device System Clip Design Specific Advantages
Ovesco OTSC Bear-trap hinge design (Nitinol). Exceptional compressive strength; dedicated twin-graspers available.
Padlock Clip Star-shaped 360-degree radial closure (Nitinol). Even distribution of radial tissue compression; push-button deployment.
Through-the-Scope (TTS) Linear approximation. Fits down the channel instantly; weak against indurated tissue.

Macroscopic Clip Systems for Defect Closure

Full-thickness endoscopic defect closure is governed by cap-mounted macroscopic clips. While the OTSC system is historically dominant, the newer Padlock Clip offers alternative deployment mechanics. Rather than a hinged jaw, the Padlock utilizes a star-shaped, six-pointed nitinol ring that contracts circumferentially upon deployment, bunching the aspirated tissue into a tight, secure star-burst pattern.

Comparative Clinical Utilities

Push-button deployment associated with the Padlock clip eliminates the need for hand-crank rotary systems, simplifying the ergonomic workflow for the endoscopist. However, OTSC retains an advantage in highly fibrotic chronic fistulas where rigid twin-graspers are required to physically drag the margins into the chamber. Proper pre-procedural sizing of the endoscope cap relative to the diameter of the working gastroscope/colonoscope is critical for both platforms.


Clinical guidelines summarized by the Gastroscholar Research Team. Last updated: 2026. This article is intended for physicians.

Written by Dr. gastroscholar.com, MD, FACG

Clinical researcher and practicing Gastroenterologist contributing to advancing GI knowledge and endoscopic techniques.

Fact Checked Updated Apr 17, 2026
Scroll to Top